| Question of the Day: | Name: |
| Plate Tectonics Scientific Argument |
|
|
|
Perm: |
<QOTD Index><Course Home Page>
| Observation, Description, and Interpretation in Science Argumentation
There are six figures shown, each representing ones you might use in a scientific paper. They are labeled Figure 1, 2, 3, etc. Suppose that you have done a study of the Tonga/Fiji trench region and have created the four figures from your data. You have also sketched the two models, one of which fits the data. The purpose of this exercise is for you to quickly write an argument that will convince the reader that one or the other of the model sketches (figures 5 or 6) is the correct one. Use scientific style. The point of this is to make a good scientific argument, and to choose the correct model. Do not mention the model that you feel is the wrong one. Concentrate on the best argument for the model you agree with.
In building your argument, be sure you do the following: 1) Describe the data:
2) Name features identified using the data
3) Describe features observed in the data
4) Describe relationships between observed features. Note that a scientific finding is always stronger when several kinds of data are available to support the result.
5) Describe your model or theory
6) Describe relationships between your model and the observations
Begin your writing here. Please write clearly (ink, not light, hard to read pencil).
|